A 20-year-old man was killed in a Monterey County car accident after his vehicle was hit head-on by a GMC Yukon, the afternoon of June 27, 2011. According to a report in The San Jose Mercury News, the fatal car accident occurred on Highway 183, near Cooper Road, in Castroville. For unknown reasons, the 41-year-old driver of the Yukon let his vehicle veer into oncoming traffic and crashed head-on into a 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. The 20-year-old driver of the Cobalt was pronounced dead at the crash site. The driver of the Yukon sustained major injuries. The cause of the crash remains under investigation.

My heartfelt condolences go out to the family and friends of the man killed in this tragic car accident. My thoughts and prayers are with them during this difficult time.

Monterey County Car Accident Statistics

According to California Highway Patrol’s 2008 Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), 31 people were killed and 595 were injured in car accidents in the unincorporated areas of Monterey County. During that same year, there were 40 fatalities and 1470 personal injuries reported due to Monterey County car accidents.

What Caused This Fatal Car Accident?

Based on this news report, it is not quite clear what caused these vehicles to crash head-on. But it appears that the driver of the GMC Yukon veered into opposing lanes of traffic and struck the other vehicle. California Vehicle Code Section 21651 (a): "Whenever a highway has been divided into two or more roadways by means of intermittent barriers or by means of a dividing section of not less than two feet in width, either unpaved or delineated by curbs, double-parallel lines, or other markings on the roadway, it is unlawful…to drive any vehicle over, upon, or across the dividing section." I trust officials are also looking into whether driver impairment, distraction, fatigue or inattention led to this fatal car accident.

Fault and Liability

If the driver of the Yukon is determined to have been at fault, he could be held liable for the victim's wrongful death. The family of a deceased victim in such cases can file a wrongful death claim seeking compensation for medical and funeral expenses, lost future income, loss of companionship, and other related damages. An experienced California personal injury lawyer will be able to better advise injured victims and their families about their legal rights and options.

Lost a family member in a California car accident? Want to know your rights? Want to know what your case is worth? Want compensation? Want justice? Want to ensure the same thing doesn’t happen to another family?

Call your best friends in the legal industry after a fatal Monterey County head-on car accident. Call 866-990-8787. The call is free. The advice may be priceless.

Call a BISNAR | CHASE California wrongful death lawyer for a free professional evaluation of your rights by attorneys who have been representing families of deceased accident victims since 1978. You will experience award winning representation and outstanding personal service by a compassionate and understanding law firm in a comfortable environment.

Fatal Car Accident Involves Head-On Collision is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

Chris Martinez, 28, was critically injured in a car accident involving three vehicles, the morning of June 11, 2011. According to a news report in The Lompoc Record, the serious injury accident occurred on Highway 246 west of Campbell Road in Lompoc. Martinez slowed down his 2000 Honda to make a left hand turn when a 1992 Lexus, driven by 22-year-old Jessica Herrera, crashed into the back of his car. The Honda then spun into oncoming traffic and crashed into a 2008 Ford F-150 pickup truck.

Martinez has been listed in critical condition after suffering a collapsed lung and head trauma. Deborah Jenae, a passenger in the truck sustained a broken back and has been listed in stable condition. Kevin Belstler, 51, the driver of the truck sustained moderate injuries and Herrera suffered minor pain in her arms.

My thoughts and prayers are with Chris Martinez and everyone injured in this terrible car crash. I wish them all a complete and speedy recovery.

Car Accident Statistics

According to California Highway Patrol’s 2008 Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), two people were killed and 115 were injured in Lompoc car accidents. During that same year, there were 35 fatalities and 1,952 personal injuries reported due to Santa Barbara County car accidents.

What Caused This Serious Injury Accident?

It appears from the report that the driver of the Lexus crashed into the back of the Honda, which had slowed down to make a left hand turn. Investigators will have to determine why the driver of the Lexus was unable to avoid the collision. It is not clear if the driver of the Lexus was speeding, driving distracted, or driving in a reckless manner.

Rear-end accidents are often caused by drivers following too close behind another vehicle or by distracted drivers. California Vehicle Code Section 21703 states: "The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway." California Vehicle Code Section 21704 also states that the driver "shall keep the vehicle he is driving at a distance of not less than 300 feet to the rear of any other motor vehicle subject to such speed restriction which is preceding it."

Liability Issues

In this particular case, if the driver of the Lexus is determined to have been at fault, she could be held liable for the resulting injuries and damages. Injured victims can seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, cost of hospitalization, rehabilitation and other related damages. Car accident victims would be well-advised to contact an experienced California personal injury lawyer, who will better advise them about their legal rights and options.

Seriously injured in a California car accident?  Want to know if you have a case?  Want to know what your case is worth?  Want compensation for your injuries?  Want justice?  Want to make sure the same thing doesn’t happen to someone else?
 
Call your best friends in the legal industry after a Santa Barbara County rear-end car accident. Call 866-990-8787. The call is free. The advice may be priceless.
 
Call a BISNAR | CHASE California personal injury attorney for a free professional evaluation of your case by attorneys who have represented over 6,000 clients since 1978. You will experience award winning representation and outstanding personal service by a friendly law firm in a comfortable environment.

Car Accident Causes Critical Injuries is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

Roberta Leggitt, 73, Marian Kalfsbeek, 85, and Atlee Snoe, 20, were all injured in a Colusa County car accident involving two vehicles, the evening of June 1, 2011. According to a news report in The Colusa Sun-Herald, the injury accident occurred between a 2008 Ford Escape and a 2005 Ford Ranger at the intersection of County Line Road and Old Highway 99W in Colusa County. The Escape carrying Leggitt and Kalfsbeek, was traveling north when the Ranger, driven by Snoe, pulled in front of it at the intersection. All three victims of this Colusa County car accident sustained what were described as moderate injuries. It is unclear if Snoe will be cited for causing the crash.

My thoughts and prayers are with all three victims of this Colusa County car crash. I wish them all a complete and speedy recovery.

Car Accident Statistics

According to California Highway Patrol’s 2008 Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), six people were killed and 114 were injured as a result of car accidents in the unincorporated areas of Colusa County. During that same year, there were six fatalities and 138 personal injuries reported as a result of car accidents in Colusa County as a whole.

What Caused This Intersection Accident?

It appears from the report the driver of the Ranger turned in front of the Escape. It seems that the driver of the Ranger may have failed to yield right-of-way to the oncoming vehicle. According to California Vehicle Code Section 21800 (a): "The driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle which has entered the intersection from a different highway."

Liability Issues

If the driver of the Ranger is determined to have been at fault, that driver can be held liable for the resulting accident and injuries. Victims of negligent drivers may pursue financial compensation for their losses by filing a personal injury claim. In such cases, damages that may be covered by a successful civil lawsuit include hospital bills, time away from work, physical suffering and emotional distress. An experienced California personal injury lawyer can help an accident victim better understand his or her legal rights and options. The best personal injury law firms will always offer a free consultation and comprehensive evaluation to car accident victims and their families.

Seriously injured in a California car accident? Want to know if you have a case? Want to know what your case is worth? Want compensation for your injuries? Want justice? Want to make sure the same thing doesn’t happen to someone else?

Call your best friends in the legal industry after a Colusa County street intersection accident. Call 866-990-8787. The call is free. The advice may be priceless.

Call a BISNAR | CHASE California personal injury attorney for a free professional evaluation of your case by attorneys who have represented over 6,000 clients since 1978. You will experience award winning representation and outstanding personal service by a friendly law firm in a comfortable environment.

Car Accident Injures Three in Colusa County is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

In spite of California law banning the practice and numerous studies concluding that distracted driving can lead to deadly car accidents, drivers are still texting behind the wheel. According to an Auto Club finding released this week that sampled 4,000 vehicles and drivers in Orange County, 2.7 percent of motorists were observed texting at any given time. That is twice the rate surveyed in January 2009, when California's texting ban went into effect.

Auto Club officials say the increase in texting and driving shows the need for better enforcement of the law and more severe penalties for those who violate the texting ban. At this time, drivers who are caught texting while driving are fined $20 for a first offense. There are no points added to a driver's record in connection with the violation. SB 1475, which proposed to increase penalty and points to driving records, recently failed to pass in the State Legislature.

Distracted Driving Statistics

Distracted driving has caused a great number of fatal accidents and injured thousands of drivers nationwide over the last five years when cell phone use has increased to an all-time high. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), about 6,000 people died and 500,000 sustained personal injuries in 2008 in nationwide crashes caused by distracted drivers.

California Highway Patrol's statistics also indicate a similar trend. CHP officials say the number of citations issued for hand-held cell phones has increased in California – from 7,779 in July 2008 to 12,761 in July 2009. Since the hand-held law became effective, CHP officials have issued a total of 173,616 citations for violations.

Following the Law

California Vehicle Code Section 23123 (a): "A person shall not drive a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone unless that telephone is specifically designed and configured to allow hands-free listening and talking, and is used in that manner while driving."

Of all forms of distracted driving, texting is the most dangerous because it takes your eyes off the road, your hands off the wheel and your mind off driving. In the three or four seconds that it takes to send, receive or view a text message, your car travels the entire length of a football field!

As a California personal injury lawyer who represents injured car accident victims, it is my opinion that distracted drivers should face greater penalties for disobeying this important law. Drivers who violate the texting ban should also have points added on to their driving records. A $20 fine is hardly enough to motivate drivers to put their cell phones down. Laws and regulations aside, it is important for us as motorists to realize that texting while driving is dangerous and irresponsible. No communication is more important than a life – whether it's your life or the life of someone on the road.

Do you text and drive? Do you know of others who text and drive? What, in your opinion, will motivate Californians to stay away from texting while driving?

Texting and Driving Still the Norm in California is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

Seven people were injured in a San Francisco car accident after a 15-year-old with a learner's permit lost control of the station wagon she was driving and collided head-on with another vehicle. According to a news report in the Santa Cruz Sentinel, the injury collision occurred the afternoon of August 12, 2010 on West Beach Street in Pajaro Dunes.

The teen driver allowed a front tire of her 1992 Subaru Legacy to go onto the gravel shoulder of the roadway, overcorrected, before entering opposing lanes of traffic. She then crashed head-on into a 1993 Geo Prizm. The 27-year-old driver of the Prizm and his 44-year-old male passenger sustained fractures and internal injuries. The teen driver of the Subaru, her mother and two other teens in the back seat suffered minor injuries, while another 16-year-old girl sustained major leg injuries. An investigation is ongoing.

My heart goes out to everyone who was injured in this tragic crash. I wish them all the very best for a quick and complete recovery. Please keep them in your thoughts and prayers.

Teen Driving Statistics

According to a 2008 study released by the Auto Club, car accidents involving teen drivers, ages 15 to 17, costs California about $2.8 billion annually and more than $34 billion nationwide. This is money that includes medical expenses, loss of wages, property damage, loss of quality of life and other related expenses for the year 2006. These numbers were reportedly calculated based on 66,785 crashes that occurred in 2006. That includes 177 fatalities and 27,869 personal injuries, according to the report.

Importance of a GDL Program

In this particular case, officials say the teen did nothing wrong and followed all the rules. But her inexperience proved costly for the two men and a young girl who were seriously injured in this crash. Such accidents remind us of the importance of improving the graduated driver licensing (GDL) program in California. GDL has been a proven measure to reduce injuries and deaths from accidents involving teen drivers. GDL eases teens into driving by requiring them to practice more, and limits their exposure to danger by requiring them, for example, not to drive at night.

In 1998, the state of California enacted a new law requiring all new teen drivers to go through a three-step process in order to get a driver's license. This includes going through 50 hours of supervised driving. However, in this particular case, the accident happened in spite of the fact that all rules were followed. This clearly shows more needs to be done to ensure the safety of our youngest drivers and others with whom they share the roads.

Victims' Claim for Compensation

Victims of such accidents would be well-advised to contact an experienced San Francisco personal injury lawyer to get more information about their legal rights and options. Victims and their families could seek compensation to cover medical expenses, loss of wages, cost of hospitalization, rehabilitation, long-term care and other related damages.

What steps do you take as a parent to ensure that the teen drivers in your home are safe?

None of the parties mentioned in this article are represented by us at the time this article was posted. The source of our information is cited in the article. If you were involved in this incident and have questions as to your rights and options, call a reputable law firm for a consultation. Do not act solely upon the information provided herein. The BISNAR | CHASE personal injury law firm will provide free, confidential consultation to "not at fault" persons and their family members if you mention your source was the “Personal Injury Law Journal." They can be reached at 866-456-5235 during California business hours.

San Francisco Bay Area Car Crash Injures Seven is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

The Salinas, California-based salad company, Fresh Express, is recalling some of its products because of food poisoning concerns. According to a CBS news report, the company, along with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, has announced a voluntary recall of 2,825 cases of Veggie Lovers Salad because random testing revealed the presence of the bacteria in their products. Just last month, the company pulled some of its salads from stores because of E. coli contamination. Fresh Express also recalled several types of ready-to-eat salads in May after salmonella was found in a package tested by federal officials.

Were Food Safety Standards Violated?

It is cause for concern that the products made and distributed by the same company tested positive for three different strains of lethal bacteria that are transmitted through food – all within a space of three months. There are several important questions to be asked here. Is there a breakdown in food safety and handling procedures at this company's manufacturing and processing facilities? How often are these facilities being inspected? How many violations have FDA officials found at these facilities? Are they being allowed to function in spite of various violations? If that is the case, what is the point of food safety inspections?

Deadly Food-Borne Illnesses

E.coli and salmonella are food-borne illnesses, which could result in serious personal injuries including organ damage or even death. Listeria is a type of bacterium, which can cause an infection known as Listeriosis, which can also result in serious and long-term adverse health problems.

The most common symptoms of Listeriosis are fever, muscle aches, nausea and diarrhea. Symptoms may begin a few days after you have eaten the contaminated food. But it may take as a long as two months before signs and symptoms begin. If the infection spreads to the nervous system, you may experience symptoms such as headache, stiffness, confusion, loss of balance and convulsions. Listeria infection can have devastating consequences for pregnant women. The baby may die unexpectedly before birth or experience a life-threatening infection within the first few days of birth.

Liability Issues

Please remember that if negligence on the part of the food manufacturer or distributor causes your illness, then they could be held liable for any injuries or damages caused. Those affected by these food-borne illnesses can seek compensation for medical expenses, loss of wages, cost of hospitalization, diagnostic tests, pain and suffering, emotional distress and other damages. An experienced California personal injury lawyer will be able to advise victims and their families in such cases about their legal rights and options.

Have you ever suffered any type of food poisoning? We would like to hear about your experiences.

Fresh Express Recalling Salad Products for Listeria Risks is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

It is a well-known fact that nursing home neglect and abuse is one of the biggest problems facing seniors in America today. In a recent case, a nursing home in Los Altos, California, was fined $100,000 for alleged negligence that resulted in the death of an 85-year-old resident. According to CBS News report, a California Department of Public Health investigation determined that the staff at Pilgrim Haven Health Facility "failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to a resident who had a history of failing."

Officials say the elderly man, who was suffering from dementia, called out for help after he fell in December. He told a nursing assistant that he did not hit his head. Hours after the fall, he became ill and unresponsive. He was then transferred to a hospital where he died the next day. Head injuries were ruled as the cause of death in his case.

My heart goes out to the family of this elderly man who believed that he would get proper care and attention in this nursing home. Please keep this grieving family in your thoughts and prayers.

Increasing Incidence of Neglect

In this particular case, the nursing home received the highest possible fine or an AA citation, which is handed out for the most serious types of violations. Almost always, these citations are issued in cases where the nursing home's actions directly cause serious personal injuries or death.

According to a 2008 Government Accountability Office (GAO) 1,285 nursing homes were cited in 2007 for "actual harm or immediate jeopardy" to residents. Based on GAO's statistics, California leads all other states, by far, in the number of citations. Understaffing and lack of training are the most common factors linked to nursing home neglect.

Putting Profits Ahead of People

According to a report by the California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR), turnover rates in nursing homes among nursing assistants in 2002 was over 80 percent in 19 states and 100 percent in 10 states. The same report also cites a 2005 analysis of nursing home staffing data, which shows that the proportion of care provided by registered nurses is on the decline despite increases in Medicare funding specifically set aside for nursing.

A number of these tragedies occur because nursing homes put profit ahead of the people they are supposed to serve. Families of victims who have been harmed by nursing home neglect or abuse would be well-advised to contact an experienced San Francisco personal injury lawyer, who will ensure that the wrongdoers are held accountable. Where negligence or wrongdoing is involved, the family of a deceased victim can file a wrongful death claim seeking compensation for their irreparable loss.

Do you have a loved one in a nursing home? What are some serious concerns you have about their well-being and care?

None of the parties mentioned in this article are represented by us at the time this article was posted. The source of our information is cited in the article. If you were involved in this incident and have questions as to your rights and options, call a reputable law firm for a consultation. Do not act solely upon the information provided herein. The BISNAR | CHASE personal injury law firm will provide free, confidential consultation to "not at fault" persons and their family members if you mention your source was the “Personal Injury Law Journal." They can be reached at 866-456-5235 during California business hours.

San Francisco Area Nursing Home Fined for Negligence is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

A pit bull attacked a young girl in Oakland causing serious personal injuries, according to a Bay City News report. Police officials say the brutal dog attack occurred the afternoon of July 25, 2010 when a pit bull terrier attacked the girl. Those who witnessed the incident told officials that the dog owner asked the 7-year-old girl if she wanted to pet the dog moments before the attack. The girl sustained severe facial injuries. Thankfully, she is expected to survive. An investigation is ongoing.

I sympathize with this little girl and her family for what they are going through at this time. I hope this child is not left with permanent scars on her face and pray for her quick and complete recovery.

Dog Bite Statistics

According to Dogsbite.org, a Web site for dog attack victims nationwide, of the 88 fatal dog attacks in the United States in a three-year period between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008, 59 percent or 52 incidents involved pit bulls followed by Rottweilers (14 percent), American bulldog and Husky (5 percent each). This dog bite fatality finding is more or less consistent with an earlier report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, which states that pit bulls and Rottweilers together account for 60 percent of fatal dog attacks.

Laws and Compensation Issues

California's strict liability statute holds dog owners responsible for their pets' actions – whether the attack occurs on public or private property. California’s Civil Code Section 3342 which states: "The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner’s knowledge of such viciousness."
It would be in the best interests of the injured victims' families to contact a reputed California personal injury lawyer who will analyze all aspects of the incident and ensure that the negligent dog owner is held financially responsible for the injuries and losses caused. If the dog owner also owns a home, then his or her homeowner's insurance should cover the loss and damages sustained by the dog bite victim.

Would you keep a pit bull in your house? Do you think the problem in pit bull attack cases has to do with the breed or the owner?

None of the parties mentioned in this article are represented by us at the time this article was posted. The source of our information is cited in the article. If you were involved in this incident and have questions as to your rights and options, call a reputable law firm for a consultation. Do not act solely upon the information provided herein. The BISNAR | CHASE personal injury law firm will provide free, confidential consultation to "not at fault" persons and their family members if you mention your source was the “Personal Injury Law Journal." They can be reached at 866-456-5235 during California business hours.

Pit Bull Severely Injures 7-year-old Oakland Girl is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

Two-year-old Jacob Bisbee was killed in a dog bite incident in Concord after he was attacked by three of his step-grandfather's pit bulls the morning of July 22, 2010. According to a news report in the Contra Costa Times, the fatal dog attack occurred in the 1700 block of Trailcreek Court, when little Jacob walked into the garage where the three dogs were kept. The pit bills brutally attacked the child causing fatal injuries. Jacob was taken to a local hospital where he died.

His step grandfather, Steven Hayashi, 52, has been arrested on suspicion of felony child endangerment and possession of mischievous animals resulting in death. Hayashi's five dogs were euthanized by animal service shortly after the attack. Although Jacob's grandmother and uncle were home, it is not clear whether Jacob was supervised and how or why he got into the garage.

Tragic Death of a Child

My heart goes out to everyone who knew and loved little Jacob Bisbee. This tragic dog attack could have and should have been prevented. Hayashi had not one, but five ferocious dogs in a house where there were at least two young children. Why was this victim left unsupervised? Why was the garage door not secured at the time? This boy died tragically and unnecessarily. I trust the dog owner in this case will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Statistics Relating to Dog Bites

Dog bite statistics consistently show that pit bulls cause the majority of fatal dog attacks and the most serious personal injuries in the United States. According to a report released by Dogsbite.org, during the five-year period between January 1, 2005 and March 8, 2010, 158 fatal dog attacks took place in the United States. Pit bulls were responsible for 56 percent of these attacks. This amounts to a pit bull killing an American every 21.5 days. The numbers also show that there were 32 dog bite-related deaths in 2009 – 14 caused by pit bulls and four by Rottweilers.

Should Pit Bulls Be Banned?

Concord city officials attempted to change the city's laws relating to pit bulls, after pit bulls mauled an 11-year-old in 2005. However, they could not act to ban this breed because California laws prohibit breed bans. In this particular case, several neighbors have told the newspaper that they had felt threatened on previous occasions by Hayashi's dogs. Some complained to the city, but got a response from officials saying that Hayashi did nothing wrong or illegal. It is tragic that it took the death of this little boy for the city to be able to confiscate the pit bulls and destroy them.
Dog bite victims and their families would be well-advised to contact an experienced California personal injury lawyer to find out more information about how to pursue their legal rights.

Do you believe pit bulls should be banned in California or nationwide? We would like to hear your opinions on this important issue.

None of the parties mentioned in this article are represented by us at the time this article was posted. The source of our information is cited in the article. If you were involved in this incident and have questions as to your rights and options, call a reputable law firm for a consultation. Do not act solely upon the information provided herein. The BISNAR | CHASE personal injury law firm will provide free, confidential consultation to "not at fault" persons and their family members if you mention your source was the “Personal Injury Law Journal." They can be reached at 866-456-5235 during California business hours.

Dog Attack Fatally Injures Toddler is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

We all know that a number of Los Angeles car accidents are caused by distracted drivers, especially those who text while driving. CBS News reports that the city is cracking down on texting drivers, specifically the younger drivers, by launching a campaign directed against them. The "No Texting While Driving" public safety campaign is being led by AT&T.

Recent studies have all shown that texting is the worst form of distracted driving. It takes your hands off the wheel, eyes off the road and your attention somewhere else. It is pretty much like driving with your eyes closed.

Distracted Driving Statistics

According to California Highway Patrol officials, the number of citations issued for hand-held cell phones has increased in California – from 7,779 in July 2008 to 12,761 in July 2009. Since the hand-held law became effective, CHP officials have issued a total of 173,616 citations for violations.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), all forms of distracted driving caused 515,000 personal injuries and 5,870 fatalities in 2008, nationwide. The National Safety Council blames 28 percent of car accidents each year on motorists talking on a handheld cell phone or texting while driving. A recent study by Virginia Tech also showed that texting drivers are 23 times more likely to get in a car accident.

The Laws Relating to Handheld Cell Phones

California law prohibits drivers from texting or using a handheld cell phone while driving. According to California Vehicle Code Section 23123 (a): "A person shall not drive a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone unless that telephone is specifically designed and configured to allow hands-free listening and talking, and is used in that manner while driving."

Texting while Driving Can Be Deadly

I'm pleased that the city of Los Angeles is launching this awareness campaign. As parents, we need to be role models for our children. If we text while driving or talk on a handheld cell phone while driving, what kind of a message are we sending out to our children – the future drivers?

Please remember that if you cause an accident while texting and driving, you could be held liable for the accident and injuries caused to victims. If you were injured in an accident as the result of a distracted driver, please get in touch with an experienced Los Angeles personal injury lawyer to get more information about your legal rights and options.

Do you text while driving? What do you think causes people to continue to indulge in this habit in spite of knowing that it could be dangerous?

Los Angeles Launches Campaign against Texting Drivers is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal